Comparison of the Results of Prenatal and Postnatal Echocardiography and Postnatal Cardiac MRI in Children with a Congenital Heart Defect.
Marios MamalisTamara KoehlerIvonne Alexandra BedeiAline WolterJohanna SchenkEllyda WidrianiRoland Axt-FliednerPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2023)
Prenatal echocardiography could be shown to be a reliable method for detection of congenital heart disease when regarding the slightly lower accuracy of diagnosis for double outlet right ventricle and right heart anomalies. Furthermore, the impact of examiner experience and the consideration of follow-up examinations for further improvement of diagnosis accuracy may not be underestimated. The main advantage of an additional MRI is the possibility to obtain a detailed anatomic description of the blood vessels of the lung and the outflow tract. The conduction of further studies that include false-negative and false-positive cases, and studies that are not set within the high-risk-group, as well as studies in a less specialized setting, would allow the completion and investigation of possible differences and discrepancies when comparing the results that have been obtained in this study.
Keyphrases
- congenital heart disease
- left ventricular
- pulmonary hypertension
- case control
- magnetic resonance imaging
- computed tomography
- pregnant women
- contrast enhanced
- preterm infants
- heart failure
- young adults
- mitral valve
- diffusion weighted imaging
- atrial fibrillation
- pulmonary artery
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- magnetic resonance
- real time pcr
- quantum dots