Login / Signup

Comparing ecosystem gaseous elemental mercury fluxes over a deciduous and coniferous forest.

Jun ZhouSilas W BollenEric M RoyDavid Y HollingerTing WangJohn T LeeDaniel Obrist
Published in: Nature communications (2023)
Sources of neurotoxic mercury in forests are dominated by atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) deposition, but a dearth of direct GEM exchange measurements causes major uncertainties about processes that determine GEM sinks. Here we present three years of forest-level GEM deposition measurements in a coniferous forest and a deciduous forest in northeastern USA, along with flux partitioning into canopy and forest floor contributions. Annual GEM deposition is 13.4 ± 0.80 μg m -2 (coniferous forest) and 25.1 ± 2.4 μg m -2 (deciduous forest) dominating mercury inputs (62 and 76% of total deposition). GEM uptake dominates in daytime during active vegetation periods and correlates with CO 2 assimilation, attributable to plant stomatal uptake of mercury. Non-stomatal GEM deposition occurs in the coniferous canopy during nights and to the forest floor in the deciduous forest and accounts for 24 and 39% of GEM deposition, respectively. Our study shows that GEM deposition includes various pathways and is highly ecosystem-specific, which complicates global constraints of terrestrial GEM sinks.
Keyphrases
  • climate change
  • human health
  • depressive symptoms
  • risk assessment
  • cell wall
  • drinking water
  • particulate matter