Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation: Which One Is a True Marker?
Pipin ArdhiantoYoga YuniadiPublished in: Cardiology research and practice (2019)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmias and associated with the risk of stroke and death. Continuous development of the diagnostic tool and prognostic stratification may lead to optimal management of AF. The use of biomarkers in the management of AF has been grown as an interesting topic. However, the AF biomarkers are not yet well established in the major guidelines. Among these biomarkers, a lot of data show troponin and brain natriuretic peptides are promising for the prediction of future events. The troponin elevation in AF patients may not necessarily be diagnosed as myocardial infarction or significant coronary artery stenosis, and brain natriuretic peptide elevation may not necessarily confirm heart failure. Troponin T and troponin I may predict postoperative AF. Furthermore, troponin and brain natriuretic peptide gave better prognostic performance when compared with the risk score available today.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- heart failure
- oral anticoagulants
- catheter ablation
- left atrial
- left atrial appendage
- direct oral anticoagulants
- coronary artery
- white matter
- resting state
- ejection fraction
- left ventricular
- end stage renal disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- functional connectivity
- cerebral ischemia
- current status
- clinical practice
- patients undergoing
- big data
- brain injury
- peritoneal dialysis
- artificial intelligence
- deep learning
- machine learning
- subarachnoid hemorrhage
- amino acid