Login / Signup

Quality of Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry: Systematic Literature Review.

Delphine CarliGuillaume FahrniPascal BonnabryChristian Lovis
Published in: JMIR medical informatics (2018)
There is increasing reporting of alerts override in CPOE decision support. Several causes are discussed in the literature, the most important one being the clinical relevance of alerts. In this paper, we tried to assess formally the clinical relevance of alerts, using a near-strong proxy, which is the PPV of alerts, or any way to express it such as the rate of true and false positive alerts. In doing this literature review, three inferences were drawn. First, very few papers report direct or enough indirect elements that support the use or the computation of PPV, which is a gold standard for all diagnostic tools in medicine and should be systematically reported for decision support. Second, the PPV varies a lot according to the typology of decision support, so that overall rates are not useful, but must be reported by the type of alert. Finally, in general, the PPVs are below or near 50%, which can be considered as very low.
Keyphrases
  • case report
  • systematic review
  • primary care
  • clinical decision support
  • emergency department