Login / Signup

What does patient engagement mean for Canadian National Transplant Research Program Researchers?

Julie AllardFabián BallesterosSamantha J AnthonyVincent DumezDavid HartellGreg KnollLinda WrightMarie-Chantal Fortin
Published in: Research involvement and engagement (2018)
Background Involving patients in research has been acknowledged as a way to enhance the quality, relevance and transparency of medical research. No previous studies have looked at researchers' perspectives on patient engagement (PE) in organ donation and transplant research in Canada. Objective The aim of this study was to gather the perspectives of Canadian National Transplant Research Program (CNTRP) researchers on PE in research. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten researchers who attended a national workshop on priority-setting in organ donation and transplant research. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the transcripts were subjected to qualitative thematic and content analyses. Results The researchers viewed PE in research as necessary and important. PE was a method to incorporate the voice of the patient. They also considered that patients could be engaged at every step of the research process. The following were identified as the main barriers to PE in research: (i) scientific jargon; (ii) resources (time and money); (iii) tokenism; (iv) power imbalance; and (v) patient selection. Facilitating factors included (i) training for patients and researchers, (ii) adequate resources and (iii) institutional support. Conclusion This study revealed a favourable attitude and willingness among CNTRP researchers to engage and partner with patients in research. Further studies are needed to assess the implementation of PE strategy within the CNTRP and its impact.
Keyphrases
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • quality improvement
  • newly diagnosed
  • prognostic factors
  • healthcare
  • patient reported
  • case control