Login / Signup

Comparative analysis of torque and apical force to assess the cutting behaviour of ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal endodontic instruments.

Gustavo de Cristofaro AlmeidaDiego Pinheiro AunPedro Damas ResendeIsabella Faria da Cunha PeixotoAna Cecília Diniz VianaVicente Tadeu Lopes BuonoMaria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia
Published in: Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc (2019)
This study assessed the cutting properties of two Nickel Titanium file systems with different designs and manufacturing materials. ProTaper Next X1 and X2 (PTN; Dentsply Sirona) and ProTaper Universal S2 and F1 (PTU; Dentsply Sirona) instruments were employed. The cutting parameters, that is torque and apical forces, were determined using a specially designed bench-testing machine. Dimensional and geometric parameters were considered to evaluate the results. The average maximum torque values showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among all instruments. Apical force for PTN X2 and PTU F1 instruments initially decreased and then experienced a rapid increase in the last 2 mm of the canal. For PTN X1 and PTU S2, apical force increased during the entire test. When compared to PTU files, PTN required higher torque and apical forces during the shaping procedure. The results lead us to conclude that PTN instruments demonstrated a lower cutting efficiency than PTU.
Keyphrases
  • patient reported outcomes
  • single molecule
  • gold nanoparticles
  • machine learning
  • quantum dots