Prognostic differences among Grade Group 4 subgroups in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshi SasakiShin EbaraTomoyuki TatenumaYoshinori IkehataAkinori NakayamaDaiki KatoMasahiro ToideTatsuaki YonedaKazushige SakaguchiJun TeisimaKazuhide MakiyamaHiroshi KitamuraKazutaka SaitoTakuya KoieFumitaka KogaShinji UrakamiTakahiro InouePublished in: BJUI compass (2022)
For patients with localized PCa undergoing RARP, pathological GS 4 + 4 and GS 5 + 3 were significantly associated with worse BCRFS than pathological GS 3 + 5. Pathological GS 3 + 5 may be overrated in GG 4. This observation emphasizes that primary and secondary GS should be considered to accurately stratify the risk of BCR after RARP.