Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Primary and Revision Surgery Using a Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity and Sagittal Imbalance.
Whoan Jeang KimHyun Min ShinDae Geon SongJae Won LeeKun Young ParkShann Haw ChangJin Hyun BaeWon Sik ChoyPublished in: Clinics in orthopedic surgery (2021)
Considering the greater pain and disability at the time of the revision procedure, revision patients benefited more from surgery at the 2-year follow-up than the primary surgery patients. Complication rates were similar between the groups except for proximal junctional problems and rod breakage. Therefore, revision surgery should not be avoided in the treatment of ASD patients with sagittal imbalance.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- total knee arthroplasty
- coronary artery bypass
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- total hip arthroplasty
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- multiple sclerosis
- surgical site infection
- chronic pain
- mental health
- spinal cord
- acute coronary syndrome
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- atrial fibrillation
- intellectual disability