Login / Signup

Adding ultrasound to treat-to-target shows no benefit in achieving clinical remission nor in slowing radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter prospective cohort.

Alexandre SeprianoSofia RamiroRobert LandewéDésirée van der HeijdeSarah OhrndorfOlivier FitzGeraldMarina BackhausMaggie LarchéJoanne HomikAlain SarauxHilde B HammerLene TerslevMikkel ØstergaardGerd BurmesterBernard CombeMaxime DougadosCarol HitchonGilles BoireRobert G LambertRana DadashovaJoel PaschkeEdna J HutchingsWalter P Maksymowych
Published in: Clinical rheumatology (2024)
Our results do not suggest a benefit of using the US7-score in addition to clinical information as a T2T benchmark compared to clinical information alone. Key Points • Ultrasound has a valuable role in diagnostic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis, but it is unclear whether adding ultrasound to the clinical assessment in a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy leads to more patients achieving remission and reduction in radiographic progression. • Our data from a real-world study demonstrated that adding information from ultrasound to the clinical assessment in a T2T strategy led to a lower rather than a higher likelihood of obtaining clinical remission as compared to using only clinical assessment. • Our data demonstrated that adding ultrasound data to a T2T strategy based only on clinical assessment did not offer additional protection against radiographic progression in patients with RA. • Adding US to a T2T strategy based on clinical assessment led to far more treatment intensifications (with consequences for costs and exposure to adverse events) without yielding a meaningful clinical benefit.
Keyphrases