Rectocele: Incidental or important? Observe or operate? Contemporary diagnosis and management in the multidisciplinary era.
Adil E BharuchaCharles H KnowlesPublished in: Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society (2022)
We summarize the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of rectoceles, with an emphasis on outcomes after surgical repair. This review accompanies a retrospective analysis of outcomes after multidisciplinary, transvaginal rectocele repair procedures undertaken by three colorectal surgeons in 215 patients at a large teaching hospital in the UK. A majority of patients had a large rectocele. Some patients also underwent an anterior levatorplasty and/or an enterocele repair. All patients were jointly assessed, and some patients underwent surgery by colorectal and urogynecologic surgeons. In this cohort, the perioperative data, efficacy, and harms outcomes are comparable with historical data predominantly derived from retrospective series in which patients had a good outcome (67%-78%), symptoms of difficult defecation improved (30%-50%), and patients had a recurrent rectocele 2 years after surgery (17%). Building on these data, prospective studies that rigorously evaluate outcomes after surgical repair are necessary.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- metabolic syndrome
- physical activity
- adipose tissue
- electronic health record
- coronary artery disease
- skeletal muscle
- artificial intelligence
- deep learning
- acute kidney injury
- weight loss
- data analysis
- coronary artery bypass
- glycemic control