Login / Signup

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism and the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a review of clinical outcomes and patient perspectives.

Thure Filskov OvervadTorben Bjerregaard LarsenMette SøgaardIda Ehlers AlbertsenAnne Gulbech OrdingSimon NobleAnette Arbjerg HøjenPeter Brønnum Nielsen
Published in: Expert review of cardiovascular therapy (2020)
Edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proven attractive alternatives to LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Contemporary guidelines have promptly endorsed the use of NOACs in patients with most cancer types. Nonetheless, issues remain regarding bleeding risk, interactions with medical cancer treatment, and the effectiveness and safety for extended treatment periods. There are head-to-head comparisons of the NOACs, and therefore no data favoring the use of one NOAC over the others. Patient's preferences are highly diverse and should be part of routine considerations when weighing risks and benefits associated with various available anticoagulant drugs.
Keyphrases