Login / Signup

Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?

Mihai Dan RomanSorin-Radu FleacăAdrian Gheorghe BoiceanCosmin Ioan MohorSilviu MorarHoratiu DuraAdrian Nicolae CristianDan BratuCiprian TanasescuAdrian TeodoruRadu NeculaOctav Russu
Published in: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) (2022)
The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable-the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient's condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • endothelial cells
  • primary care
  • case report
  • quality improvement
  • emergency department
  • type diabetes
  • big data
  • adverse drug
  • skeletal muscle