Leadless versus Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemakers: Three Year Follow-Up of the Micra CED Study.

This nationwide comparative evaluation of leadless VVI versus transvenous VVI de novo pacemaker implants demonstrated that the leadless group had significantly fewer complications, reinterventions, heart failure hospitalizations, and infections than the transvenous group at 3 years, confirming that the previously reported shorter-term advantages associated with leadless pacing persist and continue to accrue in the medium-to-long-term. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.