Increment Antimicrobial Resistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Invifar Network.
Luis Esau Lopez JacomeDiana Fernández-RodríguezRafael Franco CendejasAdrián Camacho-OrtízMaría Del Rayo Morfin-OteroEduardo Rodriguez-NoriegaAlfredo Ponce de León-GarduñoEdgar Ortiz-BrizuelaFabián Rojas-LariosMaría Del Consuelo Velázquez-AcostaJuan Pablo Mena-RamírezPatricia Rodríguez-ZuluetaEnrique Bolado-MartínezLuis Javier Quintanilla-CazaresLaura Karina Avilés-BenítezScarlett Consuelo-MunozElena Victoria Choy-ChangJosé Manuel Feliciano-GuzmánCarlos Antonio Couoh-MayEduardo López-GutiérrezAarón Molina-JaimesJoaquín Rincón-ZunoMariana Gil-VelozMargarita Alcaraz-EspejelReyna Edith Corte-RojasJosué Gómez-EspinosaVíctor Antonio Monroy-ColinCecilia Teresita Morales-de-la-PeñaEfrén Aguirre-BurciagaLaura Isabel López-MorenoRebeca Thelma Martínez-VillarrealCarlos Miguel Cetina-UmañaMario A GalindoGabriel Israel Soto-NietoDulce Isabel Cobos-CanulMartha Irene Moreno-MéndezDaniel Romero-RomeroSandra Quintana-PonceRaúl Peralta-CatalánAlejandro Valadez-QuirozAlejandro Molina-ChavarríaCecilia Padilla-IbarraIrma Elena Barroso-Herrera-Y-CairoLizbeth Soraya Duarte-MirandaDulce María López-LópezSamuel Pavel Escalante-ArmentaMónica Jazmín Osorio-GuzmánMaribel López-GarcíaGarza-Ramos UlisesIván Delgado-EncisoElvira Garza-GonzálezPublished in: Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) (2021)
Aim: This study aims to assess the changes in antimicrobial resistance among some critical and high-priority microorganisms collected previously and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Mexico. Methods: We collected antimicrobial susceptibility data for critical and high-priority microorganisms from blood, urine, respiratory samples, and from all specimens, in which the pathogen may be considered a causative agent. Data were stratified and compared for two periods: 2019 versus 2020 and second semester 2019 (prepandemic) versus the second semester 2020 (pandemic). Results: In the analysis of second semester 2019 versus the second semester 2020, in blood samples, increased resistance to oxacillin (15.2% vs. 36.9%), erythromycin (25.7% vs. 42.8%), and clindamycin (24.8% vs. 43.3%) (p ≤ 0.01) was detected for Staphylococcus aureus, to imipenem (13% vs. 23.4%) and meropenem (11.2% vs. 21.4) (p ≤ 0.01), for Klebsiella pneumoniae. In all specimens, increased ampicillin and tetracycline resistance was detected for Enterococcus faecium (p ≤ 0.01). In cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin, and gentamicin (p ≤ 0.01), resistance was detected for Escherichia coli; and in piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gentamicin (p ≤ 0.01), resistance was detected for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusion: Antimicrobial resistance increased in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in oxacillin resistance for S. aureus and carbapenem resistance for K. pneumoniae recovered from blood specimens deserves special attention. In addition, an increase in erythromycin resistance in S. aureus was detected, which may be associated with high azithromycin use. In general, for Acinetobacter baumannii and P. aeruginosa, increasing resistance rates were detected.
Keyphrases
- antimicrobial resistance
- pseudomonas aeruginosa
- escherichia coli
- acinetobacter baumannii
- klebsiella pneumoniae
- coronavirus disease
- multidrug resistant
- staphylococcus aureus
- gram negative
- drug resistant
- biofilm formation
- cystic fibrosis
- electronic health record
- big data
- methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus
- fine needle aspiration
- ultrasound guided