Comparison between American Institute of Medicine Guidelines and Local Recommendation for Gestational Weight Gain in Taiwanese Primiparous Women.
Alexander WaitsChao-Yu GuoAlexander WaitsPublished in: Maternal and child health journal (2021)
AUC for both guidelines ranged within 0.51-0.73. Compared to Taiwan recommendation, IOM ranges showed lower probabilities of SGA for underweight (0.11-0.15 versus 0.14-0.18), of LGA for obese (0.12-0.15 versus 0.15-0.18), of EPWR for overweight (0.19-0.30 versus 0.27-0.39), and obese (0.15-0.22 versus 0.25-0.36); and higher probabilities of EPWR for underweight (0.17-0.33 versus 0.14-0.22). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Discriminative performance of IOM and Taiwan recommendations was poor for the five adverse birth outcomes, and no preference for either set of recommendations could be inferred from our results. In the absence of specific GWG guidelines, health care workers may provide inconsistent information to their patients. Future research is needed to explore optimal GWG ranges that can reliably predict locally relevant perinatal outcomes for mother and child.
Keyphrases
- weight gain
- clinical practice
- weight loss
- body mass index
- end stage renal disease
- type diabetes
- metabolic syndrome
- birth weight
- ejection fraction
- primary care
- mental health
- chronic kidney disease
- physical activity
- newly diagnosed
- peritoneal dialysis
- bariatric surgery
- pregnancy outcomes
- patient reported outcomes
- polycystic ovary syndrome