Photosensitization Behavior of Ir(III) Complexes in Selective Reduction of CO2 by Re(I)-Complex-Anchored TiO2 Hybrid Catalyst.
Ha-Yeon CheongSo-Yoen KimYang-Jin ChoDae Won ChoChul Hoon KimHo-Jin SonChyongjin PacSang Ook KangPublished in: Inorganic chemistry (2017)
A series of cationic Ir(III) complexes ([Ir(btp)2(bpy-X2)]+ (Ir-X+: btp = (2-pyridyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl; bpy-X2 = 4,4'-X2-2,2'-bipyridine (X = OMe, tBu, Me, H, and CN)) were applied as visible-light photosensitizer to the CO2 reduction to CO using a hybrid catalyst (TiO2/ReP) prepared by anchoring of Re(4,4'-Y2-bpy)(CO)3Cl (ReP; Y = CH2PO(OH)2) on TiO2 particles. Irradiation of a solution containing Ir-X+, TiO2/ReP particles, and an electron donor (1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-1,3-dihydrobenzimidazole) in N,N-dimethylformamide at greater than 400 nm resulted in the reduction of CO2 to CO with efficiencies in the order X = OMe > tBu ≈ Me > H; Ir-CN+ has no photosensitization effect. A notable observation is that Ir-tBu+ and Ir-Me+ are less efficient than Ir-OMe+ at an early stage of the reaction but reveal persistent photosensitization behavior for a much longer period of time unlike the latter. Comparable experiments showed that (1) the Ir-X+ sensitizers are commonly superior compared to Ru(bpy)32+, a widely used transition-metal photosensitizer, and (2) the system comprising Ir-OMe+ and TiO2/ReP is much more efficient than a homogeneous-solution system using Ir-OMe+ and Re(4,4'-Y'2-bpy)(CO)3Cl (Y' = CH2PO(OEt)2). Implications of the present observations involving reaction mechanisms associated with the different behavior of the photosensitizers are discussed in detail.