Differences in family functioning before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study in Peruvian families.
Juan Carlos Bazo-AlvarezDavid Villarreal-ZegarraWilder Iván Lázaro-IllatopaDenisse Manrique-MillonesMiguel Ipanaqué-ZapataMaría José GarciaOscar Bazo-AlvarezEvelyn Goicochea-RíosWilly Valle-SalvatierraJackeline Edith García-SernaPublished in: PeerJ (2023)
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on family relationships, as several families have lost family members due to COVID-19 pandemic and become physically and emotionally estranged due to lockdown measures and critically economic periods. Our study contrasted two hypotheses: (1) family functioning changed notably before and after the COVID-19 pandemic initiation in terms of cohesion, flexibility, communication and satisfaction; (2) balanced families have a greater capacity to strictly comply with quarantine ( i.e ., social confinement), compared to unbalanced families. We performed an observational study comparing family functioning between two independent groups, evaluated before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru. A total of 7,980 participants were included in the study. For the first hypothesis, we found that, during the pandemic, families became more balanced in terms of cohesion (adjusted before-during mean difference or β 1 = 1.4; 95% CI [1.0-1.7]) and flexibility (β 2 = 2.0; 95% CI [1.6-2.4]), and families were less disengaged (β 3 = -1.9; 95% CI [-2.3 to -1.5]) and chaotic (β 4 = -2.9; 95% CI [-3.3 to -2.4]). Regarding the second hypothesis, we confirmed that families with balanced cohesion (adjusted prevalence ratio or aPR = 1.16; 95% CI [1.12-1.19) and flexibility (aPR = 1.23; 95% CI [1.18-1.27]) allowed greater compliance with quarantine restrictions; while disengaged (aPR = 0.91; 95% CI [0.88-0.93]) and chaotic families (aPR = 0.89; 95% CI [0.87-0.92]) were more likely to partially comply or not comply with the quarantine. Finally, family communication (aPR = 1.17; 95% CI [1.11-1.24]) and satisfaction (aPR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.11-1.25]) also played a role in favouring quarantine compliance. This new evidence enlightens the family systems theory while informing future interventions for improving compliance with quarantine measures in the context of social confinement.