Login / Signup

Understanding how Victoria, Australia gained control of its second COVID-19 wave.

James M TrauerMichael J LydeamoreGregory W DaltonDavid PilcherMichael T MeehanEmma S McBrydeAllen C ChengBrett SuttonRomain Ragonnet
Published in: Nature communications (2021)
During 2020, Victoria was the Australian state hardest hit by COVID-19, but was successful in controlling its second wave through aggressive policy interventions. We calibrated a detailed compartmental model of Victoria's second wave to multiple geographically-structured epidemic time-series indicators. We achieved a good fit overall and for individual health services through a combination of time-varying processes, including case detection, population mobility, school closures, physical distancing and face covering usage. Estimates of the risk of death in those aged ≥75 and of hospitalisation were higher than international estimates, reflecting concentration of cases in high-risk settings. We estimated significant effects for each of the calibrated time-varying processes, with estimates for the individual-level effect of physical distancing of 37.4% (95%CrI 7.2-56.4%) and of face coverings of 45.9% (95%CrI 32.9-55.6%). That the multi-faceted interventions led to the dramatic reversal in the epidemic trajectory is supported by our results, with face coverings likely particularly important.
Keyphrases
  • physical activity
  • coronavirus disease
  • mental health
  • sars cov
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • loop mediated isothermal amplification