Clinical impact of developing better practices at the institutional level on surgical outcomes after distal pancreatectomy in 1515 patients: Domestic audit of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.
Sohei SatoiTomohisa YamamotoFuyuhiko MotoiIppei MatsumotoHideyuki YoshitomiRyosuke AmanoMunenori TaharaYoshiaki MurakamiHidehito ArimitsuSeiko HironoMasayuki ShoHironori RyotaMasayuki OhtsukaMichiaki UnnoYoshifumi TakeyamaHiroki YamauePublished in: Annals of gastroenterological surgery (2018)
Proportion of patients who underwent DP in SI increased from 16.5% in 2006 to 46.4% in 2014. The SI group experienced an improved process of care and a lower frequency of severe complications vs the non-SI group (grade III/IV Clavien-Dindo; 22% vs 29%, respectively, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula; 22% vs 31%, respectively, P < .05 for both). Duration of in-hospital stay in the SI group was significantly shorter than that in the non-SI group (16 [5-183] vs 20 postoperative days [5-204], respectively; P = .002). Multivariate analysis with a mixed-effects model showed that soft pancreas, late drain removal, excess blood loss and long surgical time were risk factors for post-DP complications (P < .05). Pancreatic texture, drain management and surgical factors, but not standardization of care, were associated with a lower incidence of post-DP complications.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- risk factors
- minimally invasive
- room temperature
- palliative care
- patients undergoing
- peritoneal dialysis
- chronic kidney disease
- primary care
- prognostic factors
- magnetic resonance imaging
- pain management
- patient reported outcomes
- chronic pain
- contrast enhanced
- patient reported
- data analysis