Login / Signup

Does the gene matter? Genotype-phenotype and genotype-outcome associations in congenital melanocytic naevi.

Satyamaanasa PolubothuN McGuireL Al-OlabiW BairdN BulstrodeJ ChalkerD JosifovaD LomasJ O'HaraJ OngD RamplingP StadnikA ThomasE WedgeworthN J SebireVeronica A Kinsler
Published in: The British journal of dermatology (2019)
CMN of all sizes are most commonly caused by mutations in NRAS. BRAF is confirmed as a much rarer cause of multiple CMN, and appears to be commonly associated with a multinodular phenotype. Genotype in this cohort was not associated with differences in incidence of neurological disease in childhood. However, genotyping should be undertaken in suspected melanoma, for guidance of treatment. What's already known about this topic? Multiple congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) have been shown to be caused by NRAS mosaic mutations in 70-80% of cases, by BRAF mosaicism in one case report and by inference in some previous cases. There has been debate about genotypic association with different sizes of CMN, and no data on genotype-outcome. What does this study add? NRAS mosaicism was found in 68%, BRAF in 7% and double wild-type in 25% of cases of CMN. NRAS was the commonest mutation in all sizes of CMN, but was nearly universal in projected adult size > 60 cm. BRAF is often associated with a distinct multinodular clinical/histological phenotype. Adverse outcomes did not differ between genotypes on current numbers.
Keyphrases
  • wild type
  • genome wide
  • climate change
  • risk factors
  • electronic health record
  • high throughput
  • single cell
  • copy number
  • pulmonary embolism
  • deep learning