Login / Signup

Impact of Time on Parameters for Assessing the Microstructure Equivalence of Topical Products: Diclofenac 1% Emulsion as a Case Study.

Andreu Mañez-AsensiMª Jesús HernándezVictor Mangas SanjuanAna SalvadorMatilde Merino-SanjuánVirginia Merino
Published in: Pharmaceutics (2024)
The demonstration of bioequivalence proposed in the European Medicines Agency's (EMA's) draft guideline for topical products with the same qualitative and quantitative composition requires the confirmation of the internal structure equivalence. The impact of the shelf-life on the parameters proposed for internal structure comparison has not been studied. The objectives of this work were: (1) to quantify the effect of the time since manufacturing on the mean value and variability of the parameters proposed by the EMA to characterize the internal structure and performance of topical formulations of a complex topical formulation, and (2) to evaluate the impact of these changes on the assessment of the microstructure equivalence. A total of 5 batches of a topical emulgel containing 1% diclofenac diethylamine were evaluated 5, 14, and 23 months after manufacture. The zero-shear viscosity (η 0 ), viscosity at 100 s -1 (η 100 ), yield stress (σ 0 ), elastic (G') and viscous (G″) moduli, internal phase droplet size and in vitro release of the active ingredient were characterized. While no change in variability over time was detected, the mean value of all the parameters changed, especially the droplet size and in vitro release. Thus, combining data from batches of different manufacturing dates may compromise the determination of bioequivalence. The results confirm that to assess the microstructural similarity of complex formulations (such as emulgel), the 90% confidence interval limit for the mean difference in rheological and in vitro release parameters should be 20% and 25%, respectively.
Keyphrases
  • white matter
  • wound healing
  • single cell
  • multiple sclerosis
  • drug delivery
  • high resolution