Quality Appraisal of Nutritional Guidelines to Prevent, Diagnose, and Treat Malnutrition in All Its Forms during Pregnancy.
Cinthya Muñoz-ManriqueMónica Ancira-MorenoSoraya Burrola-MéndezLuz Isabel Omaña-GuzmánElizabeth Hoyos-LoyaSonia Hernández-CorderoAlejandra Trejo-DomínguezMónica MazariegosNatalia SmithScarlett Alonso-CarmonaJennifer Mier-CabreraLoredana Tavano-ColaizziBelén Sánchez-MúzquizFermín Avendaño-ÁlvarezKarla Muciño-SandovalNadia C Rodríguez-MoguelMagali Padilla-CamachoSalvador Espino Y SosaLizeth Ibarra-GonzálezCristina Medina-AvilésPublished in: Nutrients (2022)
This work aimed to identify clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that include recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of women's malnutrition during pregnancy and to evaluate the quality of these guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. We conducted a literature review using PubMed and different websites from January 2009 to February 2021. The quality of the CPGs was independently assessed by reviewers using the AGREE II instrument, which defines guidelines scoring >70% in the overall assessment as "high quality". The analysis included 43 guidelines. Among the main findings, we identified that only half of the CPGs (51.1%) obtained a final "high quality" evaluation. AGREE II results varied widely across domains and categories. The two domains that obtained the highest scores were scope and purpose with 88.3% (range 39 to 100%) and clarity of presentation with 87.2% (range 25 to 100%). Among the "high quality" CPGs, the best scores were achieved by the three guidelines published by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Due to the importance of maternal nutrition in pregnancy, it is essential to join forces to improve the quality of the guidelines, especially in CPGs that do not meet the reference standards for quality.