Login / Signup

Impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutation detection at diagnosis and in remission in patients with AML receiving allogeneic transplantation.

Marius BillMadlen JentzschLara BischofJessica KohlschmidtJuliane GrimmLaura Katharina SchmalbrockDonata BackhausDominic BrauerKaroline GoldmannGeorg-Nikolaus FrankeVladan VucinicDietger NiederwieserAlice S MimsUwe PlatzbeckerAnn-Kathrin EisfeldSebastian Schwind
Published in: Blood advances (2022)
Somatic mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (IDH1 and IDH2) are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The prognostic impact of the presence of IDH mutations may be influenced by the co-mutational status, the specific location of the mutation (i.e., IDH1 R132, IDH2 R140, and IDH2 R172) at diagnosis and the dynamics of the mutation burden during disease course. Even though many IDH mutated AML patients are consolidated by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the underlying biology and prognostic consequences remain largely unknown. Here we present a large analysis of 292 AML patients who received HSCT in complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete peripheral recovery (CRi) in which we assessed the IDH mutation status at diagnosis and at HSCT as a potential marker for measurable residual disease (MRD). About a quarter of all patients were IDH mutated at diagnosis. The diagnostic presence of IDH mutations in AML did not have a significant prognostic impact when consolidated with HSCT. However, IDH1 R132 and IDH2 R172 MRD positivity in remission at HSCT associated with an increased risk of relapse, while IDH2 R140 mutations did not. The IDH2 R140 variant allele frequency (VAF) at diagnosis was higher - clustering around 50% - and the mutation clearance at HSCT in morphologic remission was much lower compared to IDH1 R132 and IDH2 R172. In our cohort, IDH2 R140 mutations behaved more like a clonal hematopoiesis related abberation, while IDH1 R132 and IDH2 R172 habored AML disease specific features.
Keyphrases