Minimizing the need for coil attenuation correction in integrated PET/MRI at 1.5 T using low-density MR-linac receive arrays.

The simultaneous use of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires attenuation correction (AC) of photon-attenuating objects, such as MRI receive arrays. However, AC of flexible, on-body arrays is complex and therefore often omitted. This can lead to significant, spatially varying PET signal losses when conventional MRI receive arrays are used. Only few dedicated, photon transparent PET/MRI arrays exist, none of which are compatible with our new, wide-bore 1.5 T PET/MRI system dedicated to radiotherapy planning. In this work, we investigated the use of 1.5 T MR-linac (MRL) receive arrays for PET/MRI, as these were designed to have a low photon attenuation for accurate dose delivery and can be connected to the new 1.5 T PET/MRI scanner. Three arrays were assessed: an 8-channel clinically-used MRL array, a 32-channel prototype MRL array, and a conventional MRI receive array. We experimentally determined, simulated, and compared the impact of these arrays on the PET sensitivity and image reconstructions. Furthermore, MRI performance was compared. Overall coil-induced PET sensitivity losses were reduced from 8.5% (conventional) to 1.7% (clinical MRL) and 0.7% (prototype MRL). Phantom measurements showed local signal errors of up to 32.7% (conventional) versus 3.6% (clinical MRL) and 3.5% (prototype MRL). Simulations with data of eight cancer patients showed average signal losses were reduced from 14.3% (conventional) to 1.2% (clinical MRL) and 1.0% (prototype MRL). MRI data showed that the signal-to-noise ratio of the MRL arrays was slightly lower at depth (110 versus 135). The parallel imaging performance of the conventional and prototype MRL arrays was similar, while the clinical MRL array's performance was lower. In conclusion, MRL arrays reducein-vivoPET signal losses >10×, which decreases, or eliminates, the need for coil AC on a new 1.5 T PET/MRI system. The prototype MRL array allows flexible coil positioning without compromising PET or MRI performance. One limitation of MRL arrays is their limited radiolucent PET window (field of view) in the craniocaudal direction.