Login / Signup

Time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line ibrutinib or acalabrutinib.

Ryan JacobsXiaoxiao LuBruno EmondLaura MorrisonFrederic KinkeadPatrick LefebvreMarie-Hélène LafeuilleWasiulla KhanLinda H WuZaina P QureshiMoshe Yair Levy
Published in: Future oncology (London, England) (2023)
Aim: To investigate real-world time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line (1L) ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. Materials & methods: US specialty pharmacy electronic medical records (11/21/2018-4/30/2022) were used; patients initiated 1L on/after 11/21/2019 (acalabrutinib approval). Results: Among 710 patients receiving ibrutinib, 5.9% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 9.2 months); among 373 patients receiving acalabrutinib, 7.5% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 5.9 months). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, acalabrutinib-treated patients were 89% more likely to initiate next treatment (hazard ratio = 1.89; p = 0.016). Conclusion: This study addresses a need for real-world comparative effectiveness between 1L ibrutinib and acalabrutinib and shows that next treatment (a clinically meaningful measure for real-world progression) occurred less frequently with 1L ibrutinib.
Keyphrases
  • chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • newly diagnosed
  • ejection fraction
  • chronic kidney disease
  • replacement therapy