Choice of CTO scores to predict procedural success in clinical practice. A comparison of 4 different CTO PCI scores in a comprehensive national registry including expert and learning CTO operators.
Pablo SalinasNieves GonzaloVíctor H MorenoManuel FuentesSandra Santos-MartinezJosé Antonio Fernandez-DiazIgnacio J Amat-SantosFrancisco Bosa OjedaJuan Caballero BorregoJavier CuestaJosé María de la Torre HernándezAlejandro Diego-NietoDaniela DuboisGuillermo GaleoteJavier GoicoleaAlejandro GutiérrezMiriam Jiménez-FernándezJesús Jiménez-MazuecosAlfonso JuradoJavier LacunzaDae-Hyun LeeMaría LópezFernando LozanoJavier Martin-MoreirasVictoria Martin-YusteRaúl MillánGema MiñanaMohsen MohandesFrancisco J Morales-PonceJulio NúñezSoledad OjedaManuel PanFernando RiveroJavier RoblesSergio Rodríguez-LeirasSergio RojasJuan RondánEva RumizManel SabatéJuan SanchísBeatriz VaquerizoJavier EscanedPublished in: PloS one (2021)
Procedural percutaneous coronary intervention difficulty is not consistently depicted by available chronic total occlusion scores and is influenced by the characteristics of each chronic total occlusion cohort. In our study population, including expert and learning operators, the CASTLE score had slightly better overall performance along with CL score. However, we found only intermediate performance in the c-statistic predicting chronic total occlusion success among all scores.