Login / Signup

The use of mechanistic reasoning in assessing coronavirus interventions.

Jeffrey K AronsonDaniel Auker-HowlettVirginia GhiaraMichael P KellyJon Williamson
Published in: Journal of evaluation in clinical practice (2020)
(a) Assessment of combination therapy for MERS highlights the need for systematic assessment of mechanistic evidence. (b) That hypertension is a risk factor for severe disease in the case of SARS-CoV-2 suggests that altering hypertension treatment might alleviate disease, but the mechanisms are complex, and it is essential to consider and evaluate multiple mechanistic hypotheses. (c) Confidence that public health interventions will be effective requires a detailed assessment of social and psychological components of the mechanisms of their action, in addition to mechanisms of disease. (d) In particular, if vaccination programmes are to be effective, they must be carefully tailored to the social context; again, mechanistic evidence is crucial. We conclude that coronavirus research is best situated within the EBM+ evaluation framework.
Keyphrases
  • sars cov
  • combination therapy
  • public health
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • blood pressure
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • physical activity
  • early onset
  • coronavirus disease
  • sleep quality