Login / Signup

Benchmarking of survival outcomes following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): an update of the ongoing project of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE).

Riccardo SaccardiHein PutterDirk-Jan EikemaMaría Paula BustoEoin McGrathBas MiddelkoopGillian AdamsMarina AtlijaFrancis Ayuketang AyukHelen BaldomeroYves BeguinRafael de la CámaraÁngel CedilloAnna María Sureda BalariChristian ChabanonSelim CorbaciogluHarry DolstraRafael F DuarteRémy DuléryRaffaella GrecoAndreu GusiNada HamadMichelle KenyonNicolaus KroegerMyriam LabopinJulia LeePer LjungmanLynn MansonFlorence MensilNoel MilpiedMohamad MohtyElena OldaniKim OrchardJakob PasswegRachel PearceRégis Peffault de LatourHélène A PoirelTuula RintalaJ Douglas RizzoAnnalisa RuggeriCarla Sanchez-MartinezFermin M Sanchez-GuijoIsabel Sánchez-OrtegaMarie TrnkováDavid Valcárcel FerreirasLeonie WilcoxLiesbeth C de WreedeJohn A Snowden
Published in: Bone marrow transplantation (2023)
From 2016 EBMT and JACIE developed an international risk-adapted benchmarking program of haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) outcome to provide individual EBMT Centers with a means of quality-assuring the HSCT process and meeting FACT-JACIE accreditation requirements relating to 1-year survival outcomes. Informed by previous experience from Europe, North America and Australasia, the Clinical Outcomes Group (COG) established criteria for patient and Center selection, and a set of key clinical variables within a dedicated statistical model adapted to the capabilities of the EBMT Registry. The first phase of the project was launched in 2019 to test the acceptability of the benchmarking model through assessment of Centers' performance for 1-year data completeness and survival outcomes of autologous and allogeneic HSCT covering 2013-2016. A second phase was delivered in July 2021 covering 2015-2019 and including survival outcomes. Reports of individual Center performance were shared directly with local principal investigators and their responses were assimilated. The experience thus far has supported the feasibility, acceptability and reliability of the system as well as identifying its limitations. We provide a summary of experience and learning so far in this 'work in progress', as well as highlighting future challenges of delivering a modern, robust, data-complete, risk-adapted benchmarking program across new EBMT Registry systems.
Keyphrases