Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years.
Youngkwan SongKi Tae KimSoo Jin ParkHong Rae KimJae Suk YooPil-Je KangSung Ho JungCheol Hyun ChungJoon Bum KimHo Jin KimPublished in: Journal of chest surgery (2024)
Among patients aged 50 to 70 years who underwent surgical AVR, those receiving mechanical valves showed better survival than those with bioprosthetic valves. The mechanical AVR group exhibited a higher risk of stroke and anticoagulation-related bleeding, while the bioprosthetic AVR group showed a higher risk of AV reintervention.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve replacement
- aortic valve
- aortic stenosis
- ejection fraction
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- atrial fibrillation
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- mitral valve
- left ventricular
- heart failure
- coronary artery disease
- blood brain barrier
- brain injury
- subarachnoid hemorrhage