Accuracy of remote continuous respiratory rate monitoring technologies intended for low care clinical settings: a prospective observational study.
Kim van LoonLinda M PeelenEmmy C van de VlasakkerCor J KalkmanLeo van WolfswinkelBas van ZaanePublished in: Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie (2018)
None of the studied devices (acoustic, IPG, and radar monitor) had LoA that were within our predefined (based on clinical judgement) limits of ± 2 breaths·min-1. The acoustic breath sound monitor predicted the correct treatment more often than the IPG and the radar device.