Single monoclonal antibodies should not be used for COVID-19 therapy: a call for antiviral stewardship.
Arturo CasadevallDaniele FocosiLiise-Anne PirofskiShmuel ShohamPublished in: Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2024)
The COVID-19 pandemic saw the largest deployment of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for an infectious disease in history. mAbs to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved safe and were initially effective for COVID-19 therapy, but each was defeated by continued SARS-CoV-2 evolution, leading to their withdrawal. This was a setback for people with impaired immunity who cannot mount an effective antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 and often cannot clear the virus. New mAbs have now been developed for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PreEP) in immunosuppressed people. Here we argue that while mAb use for PreEP is justified, single mAbs should not be used for COVID-19 therapy. In contrast to PreEP where the viral inoculum is small, immunosuppressed people with COVID-19 have large viral burden that can harbor mAb-escape variants that single-agent mAb treatments can rapidly select for resistance. Selection of mAb-escape variants has potential risks for patients, society and the feasibility of mAb therapy itself.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- coronavirus disease
- monoclonal antibody
- ejection fraction
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- magnetic resonance
- infectious diseases
- copy number
- stem cells
- human health
- risk assessment
- prognostic factors
- climate change
- genome wide
- mesenchymal stem cells
- small molecule
- protein protein