Login / Signup

Unexplained syncope during pacemaker interrogation: Wand, AutoCapture, or lead-Which one is the elusive culprit?

Debabrata BeraSuchit MajumderSubir GhoseAyan KarRakesh SarkarSanjeev S Mukherjee
Published in: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE (2021)
A 65-year-old gentleman underwent dual chamber pacemaker implantation (DDDR, St Jude Medical) 7 years back for infra-hisian complete heart block. He was completely asymptomatic and came for his annual routine check-up. After undergoing ECG with and without magnet, he was prepared for device evaluation. After placing the programmer wand over the chest as soon as the ";interrogate" button on the programmer screen was pressed, the patient immediately experienced pre-syncope but recovered instantly as the wand was promptly withdrawn. After taking him to the casualty room with all resuscitation measures in hand, a repeat attempt of interrogation was made after connecting ECG, which revealed reproducible loss of capture (LOC), exclusively during wand placement. A differential diagnosis of lead failure, battery depletion, or wand related issues were considered. However, serial ECGs recorded without wand raised the possibility of AutoCapture malfunction. With all precautions, the device was programmed to fixed ventricular output mode after which interrogation could be performed safely. There was a remaining battery longevity of 2 years with acceptable lead parameters and stable threshold. He continues to be asymptomatic at 10 months of follow up.
Keyphrases
  • heart failure
  • pulmonary embolism
  • cardiac arrest
  • heart rate variability
  • healthcare
  • vena cava
  • clinical practice
  • atrial fibrillation
  • inferior vena cava
  • solid state
  • catheter ablation
  • drosophila melanogaster