Optimal hemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism patients.
Marco ZuinStanislav HenkinEileen M HarderGregory PiazzaPublished in: Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis (2024)
Hemodynamic assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a fundamental component of early risk stratification that in turn, influences subsequent monitoring and therapeutic strategies. The current body of literature and international evidence-based clinical practice guidelines focus mainly on the use of systolic blood pressure (SBP). The accuracy of this single hemodynamic parameter, however, and its optimal values for the identification of hemodynamic instability have been recently questioned by clinicians. For example, abnormal SBP or shock index may be a late indicator of adverse outcomes, signaling a patient in whom the cascade of hemodynamic compromise is already well underway. The aim of the present article is to review the current evidence supporting the use of SBP and analyze the potential integration of other parameters to assess the hemodynamic stability, impending clinical deterioration, and guide the reperfusion treatment in patients with PE, as well as to suggest potential strategies to further investigate this issue.
Keyphrases
- pulmonary embolism
- blood pressure
- inferior vena cava
- end stage renal disease
- heart failure
- systematic review
- ejection fraction
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- liver failure
- metabolic syndrome
- intensive care unit
- heart rate
- patient reported outcomes
- climate change
- risk assessment
- respiratory failure
- sensitive detection
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- weight loss
- single molecule
- patient reported