Heterogeneity in defining fetal corpus callosal pathology: systematic review.
H MahallatiAlexandros SotiriadisC CelestinAnne-Élodie MillischerP SonigoD GreventN O'GormanN Bahi-BuissonT Attié-BitachYves VilleL J SalomonPublished in: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2021)
In comparison to the postnatal literature, in the prenatal literature there is much greater heterogeneity in the nomenclature and definition of CC anomalies other than complete agenesis. This heterogeneity and lack of standard definitions in the prenatal literature make it difficult to develop large multicenter pooled cohorts of patients who can be followed in order to develop a better understanding of the genetic associations and neurodevelopmental and psychological outcomes of patients with CC anomalies. As this information is important to improve counseling of these patients, a good first step towards this goal would be to develop a simpler categorization of prenatal CC anomalies that matches better the postnatal literature. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Keyphrases
- systematic review
- pregnant women
- single cell
- meta analyses
- end stage renal disease
- preterm infants
- newly diagnosed
- magnetic resonance imaging
- ejection fraction
- prognostic factors
- type diabetes
- healthcare
- gene expression
- physical activity
- clinical trial
- adipose tissue
- social media
- ultrasound guided
- computed tomography
- depressive symptoms
- men who have sex with men
- human immunodeficiency virus
- hiv testing