Login / Signup

Intra-operative Diagnosis of Lower Segment Scar Dehiscence in a Second Gravida After One Previous Lower Segment Cesarean Section: Should We Advocate for Routine Antenatal Uterine Scar Thickness Testing?

George Uchenna ElejeGerald Okanandu UdigweChigozie Geoffrey OkaforTobechi Kingsley NjokuChukwuemeka Chukwubuikem OkoroChukwudubem Chinagorom OnyejiakaEmeka Philip IgbodikeOnyeka Chukwudalu EkwebeneEkeuda Uchenna NwankwoPerpetua Chinedu OkolieEmmanuel Chukwubuikem EgwuatuJohn Chukwuebuka NkesiObinna Carl OkaforChidimma Maryvianny OkekeDivinefavour Echezona MalachyOgechi Odinakachukwu DimgbaNwabueze Chidozie OkekeKenechukwu Chukwudum OkekeBernard Kachi NwadiliHarrison Chiro UgwuorokoCasmir Chukwudi MadubukoLambert Chukwu Onyejiaku
Published in: Clinical medicine insights. Case reports (2023)
Obstetricians are charged to maintain a high index of suspicion when managing pregnant women with history of emergency CS in order to avert the adverse consequences of uterine rupture from asymptomatic uterine dehiscence. Based on this report, it may be useful to routinely assess the lower uterine segment scar of women with previous emergency CS using the available ultrasound facilities. However, more studies are needed before advocating for routine antenatal uterine scar thickness testing following emergency lower segment CS in low and middle-income settings.
Keyphrases
  • pregnant women
  • public health
  • emergency department
  • wound healing
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • mental health
  • preterm birth
  • physical activity
  • case control