Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air®.
Bernardo Sousa-PintoPatrik EklundOliver PfaarLudger KlimekTorsten ZuberbierWienczyslawa CzarlewskiAnnabelle BédardCarsten Bindslev-JensenAnna BedbrookSinthia Bosnic-AnticevichLuisa BrussinoVictoria CardonaAlvaro A CruzGovert de VriesPhilippe DevillierWytske J FokkensJosé Miguel Fuentes-PérezBilun GemicioğluTari HaahtelaYunen Rocío Huerta-VillalobosJuan Carlos IvancevichInger KullPiotr KunaVioleta KvedarieneDésirée E Larenas LinnemannDaniel LauneMichael MakrisErik MelénMário Morais-AlmeidaRalph MosgesJoaquim MullolRobyn E O'HehirNikolaos G PapadopoulosAna Margarida PereiraEmmanuel P ProkopakisFotis PsarrosFrederico S RegateiroSietze ReitsmaBoleslaw SamolinskiNicola ScichiloneJane da SilvaCristiana StellatoAna Todo-BomPeter Valentin TomazicSanna Toppila SalmiAntonio ValeroArunas ValiulisErkka ValovirtaMichiel van EerdMaria Teresa VenturaArzu YorganciogluXavier BasagañaJosep M AntóJean BousquetJoão Almeida FonsecaPublished in: Clinical and translational allergy (2021)
In MASK-air®, daily monitoring VASs have high intra-rater reliability and moderate-high validity, reliability, and responsiveness, pointing to a reliable measure of symptom loads.