Login / Signup

Measuring readiness for implementation: A systematic review of measures' psychometric and pragmatic properties.

Bryan J WeinerKayne D MettertCaitlin N DorseyElspeth A NolenCameo StanickByron J PowellCara C Lewis
Published in: Implementation research and practice (2020)
Successful implementation of effective mental health or behavioral health treatments in service delivery settings depends in part on the readiness of the service providers and administrators to implement the treatment; the engagement of organizational leaders in the implementation effort; the resources available to support implementation, such as time, money, space, and training; and the accessibility of knowledge and information among service providers about the treatment and how it works. It is important that the methods for measuring these factors are dependable, accurate, and practical; otherwise, we cannot assess their presence or strength with confidence or know whether efforts to increase their presence or strength have worked. This systematic review of published studies sought to identify and evaluate the quality of questionnaires (referred to as measures) that assess readiness for implementation, leadership engagement, available resources, and access to knowledge and information. We identified 56 measures of these factors and rated their quality in terms of how dependable, accurate, and practical they are. Our findings indicate there is much work to be done to improve the quality of available measures; we offer several recommendations for doing so.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • quality improvement
  • primary care
  • systematic review
  • health information
  • public health
  • meta analyses
  • social media
  • clinical practice
  • risk assessment