Login / Signup

Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice.

Eric-Jan WagenmakersAlexandra SarafoglouSil AartsCasper Johannes AlbersJohannes AlgermissenŠtěpán BahníkNoah van DongenRink HoekstraDavid MoreauDon van RavenzwaaijAljaž SlugaFranziska StankeJorge Nunes TendeiroBalazs Aczel
Published in: Nature human behaviour (2021)
We argue that statistical practice in the social and behavioural sciences benefits from transparency, a fair acknowledgement of uncertainty and openness to alternative interpretations. Here, to promote such a practice, we recommend seven concrete statistical procedures: (1) visualizing data; (2) quantifying inferential uncertainty; (3) assessing data preprocessing choices; (4) reporting multiple models; (5) involving multiple analysts; (6) interpreting results modestly; and (7) sharing data and code. We discuss their benefits and limitations, and provide guidelines for adoption. Each of the seven procedures finds inspiration in Merton's ethos of science as reflected in the norms of communalism, universalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism. We believe that these ethical considerations-as well as their statistical consequences-establish common ground among data analysts, despite continuing disagreements about the foundations of statistical inference.
Keyphrases
  • electronic health record
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • big data
  • quality improvement
  • mental health
  • emergency department
  • machine learning
  • data analysis
  • single cell