Comparison of outcomes with surgical cut-down versus percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: TAVR transfemoral access comparisons between surgical cut-down and percutaneous approach.

Brandon C DraftsCharles H ChoiKunal SangalMichael W CammarataRobert J ApplegateSanjay K GandhiEdward H KincaidNeal KonDavid X M Zhao

Published in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2017)

For TF TAVR, the PC approach, when compared to the SC approach, is associated with a shorter hospital LOS and higher rate of direct discharge to home with similar risk of vascular complications, late vascular adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 12 months.

Keyphrases

transcatheter aortic valve replacement
aortic stenosis
aortic valve
minimally invasive
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
healthcare
ultrasound guided
aortic valve replacement
radiofrequency ablation
risk factors
type diabetes
adverse drug
emergency department
adipose tissue
metabolic syndrome
acute care