The potential impact of mammographic breast arterial calcification on physician practices in a primary care setting.
Melissa GennarelliAndrzej JedynakLeanne FormanEric WoldRebecca B NewmanAbhay DhandAromma KapoorFiras JafriSuman PalJay PandavEunna ChoAnusha DevarajanSrikanth YandrapalliDaniella HermanWilbert S AronowChristopher NaborsPublished in: Future cardiology (2021)
Aim: This study sought to determine breast arterial calcification (BAC) prevalence in a primary care setting and its potential use in guiding further cardiovascular workup. Materials & methods: A radiologist reviewed 282 consecutive mammograms. Characteristics of BAC-positive and negative women were compared. Results: BAC prevalence was 34%. BAC-positive women were older (mean age: 60 vs 52, p < 0.001), had higher mean 10-year cardiac risk (11 vs 6%, p < 0.001), more hypertension (65 vs 40%, p < 0.001) and coronary artery disease (10 vs 2%, p = 0.0041), statin (50 vs 32%, p = 0.006) and aspirin use (28 vs 16%, p = 0.012). Thirty-seven percent (33/96) of BAC-positive women could potentially benefit from further cardiac testing. Conclusion: Mammography identifies BAC-positive women with low traditionally assessed cardiovascular risk who might benefit from further cardiovascular workup.
Keyphrases
- primary care
- coronary artery disease
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- breast cancer risk
- risk factors
- blood pressure
- pregnancy outcomes
- healthcare
- cardiovascular disease
- cardiovascular events
- low dose
- cervical cancer screening
- general practice
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- type diabetes
- genome wide
- insulin resistance
- magnetic resonance
- pregnant women
- metabolic syndrome
- contrast enhanced
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- skeletal muscle
- image quality
- ejection fraction
- arterial hypertension