Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Extra-Short, Short, and Conventional Implants. A 3-Year Retrospective Study.
Daycelí Estévez-PérezNaia Bustamante-HernándezCarlos Labaig-RuedaMaría Fernanda Solá-RuízJosé Amengual-LorenzoFernando García-Sala BonmatíÁlvaro Zubizarreta-MachoRuben Agustin-PanaderoPublished in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2020)
extra-short (4 mm); short (6 mm); and conventional length (>8 mm) implants in the posterior maxilla present similar peri-implant bone loss and 100% survival rates in rehabilitation, by means of two splinted crowns after 36 months of functional loading. Implants placed in posterior positions present better bone loss results than implants placed in anterior positions, regardless of the interproximal area where bone loss is measured. Conventional length (>8 mm) implants show better behavior in terms of distal bone loss than short (6 mm) and extra-short (4 mm) implants.
Keyphrases