Transfer of ANS-Like Drugs from Micellar Drug Delivery Systems to Albumin Is Highly Favorable and Protected from Competition with Surfactant by "Reserved" Binding Sites.

Micellar drug delivery systems (MDDS) for the intravenous administration of poorly soluble drugs have great advantages over alternative formulations in terms of the safety of their excipients, storage stability, and straightforward production. A classic example is mixed micelles of glycocholate (GC) and lecithin, both endogenous substances in human blood. What limits the use of MDDS is the complexity of the transitions after injection. In particular, as the MDDS disintegrate partially or completely after injection, the drug has to be transferred safely to endogenous carriers in the blood, such as human serum albumin (HSA). If this transfer is compromised, the drug might precipitate─a process that needs to be excluded under all circumstances. The key question of this paper is whether the high local concentration of GC at the moment and site of MDDS dissolution might transiently saturate HSA binding sites and, hence, endanger quick drug transfer. To address this question, we have used a new approach, which is time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy of the single tryptophan in HSA, Trp-214, to characterize the competitive binding of GC and the drug substitute anilinonaphthalenesulfonate (ANS) to HSA. Time-resolved fluorescence of Trp-214 showed important advantages over established methods for tackling this problem. ANS has been the standard "model drug" to study albumin binding for decades, given its structural similarity to the class of naphthalene-containing acidic drugs and the fact that it is displaced from HSA by numerous drugs (which presumably bind to the same sites). Our complex global fit uses the critical approximation that the average lifetimes behave similarly to a single lifetime, but the resulting errors are found to be moderate and the results provide a convincing explanation of the, at first glance, counterintuitive behavior. Accordingly, and largely in line with the literature, we observed two types of sites binding ANS at HSA: 3 type A, rather peripheral, and 2 type B, likely more central sites. The latter quench Trp-214 by Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) with a rate constant of ≈0.4 ns -1 per ANS. Adding millimolar concentrations of GC displaces ANS from the A sites but not from B sites. At incomplete ANS saturation, this causes a GC-induced translocation of ANS from A to the more FRET-active B sites. This leads to the apparent paradox that the partial displacement of ANS from HSA increases its quenching effect on Trp-214. The most important conclusion is that (ANS-like) drugs cannot be displaced from the type-B sites, and consequently, drug transfer to these sites is not impaired by competitive binding of GC in the vicinity of a dissolving micelle. The second conclusion is that for unbound GC above the CMC (9 mM), ANS equilibrates between HSA and GC micelles but with a strong preference for free sites on HSA. That means that even persisting micelles would lose their cargo readily once exposed to HSA. For all MDDS sharing this property, targeted drug delivery approaches involving them as the nanocarrier would be pointless.