What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review. Part 2: Clinic-Pathologic Correlations.
Andrea PalicelliMartina BonaciniStefania CrociCristina Magi-GalluzziSofia Cañete-PortilloAlcides ChauxAlessandra BisagniEleonora ZanettiDario de BiaseBeatrice MelliFrancesca SanguedolceMagda ZanelliMaria Paola BonasoniLoredana De MarcoAlessandra SorianoStefano AscaniMaurizio ZizzoCarolina Castro RuizAntonio De LeoGuido GiordanoMatteo LandriscinaGiuseppe CarrieriLuigi CormioDaniel M BerneyJatin GandhiGiacomo SantandreaMaria Carolina GelliAlessandro TafuniMoira RagazziPublished in: Cells (2021)
Many studies have investigated the potential prognostic and predictive role of PD-L1 in prostatic carcinoma (PC). We performed a systematic literature review (PRISMA guidelines) to critically evaluate human tissue-based studies (immunohistochemistry, molecular analysis, etc.), experimental research (cell lines, mouse models), and clinical trials. Despite some controversial results and study limitations, PD-L1 expression by tumor cells may be related to clinic-pathologic features of adverse outcome, including advanced tumor stage (high pT, presence of lymph node, and distant metastases), positivity of surgical margins, high Grade Group, and castration resistance. Different PD-L1 positivity rates may be observed in matched primary PCs and various metastatic sites of the same patients. Over-fixation, type/duration of decalcification, and PD-L1 antibody clone may influence the immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1 on bone metastases. PD-L1 seemed expressed more frequently by castration-resistant PCs (49%) as compared to hormone-sensitive PCs (17%). Some series found that PD-L1 positivity was associated with decreased time to castration resistance. Treatment with ipilimumab, cyclophosphamide/GVAX/degarelix, or degarelix alone may increase PD-L1 expression. Correlation of PD-L1 positivity with overall survival and outcomes related to tumor recurrence were rarely investigated; the few analyzed series produced conflicting results and sometimes showed limitations. Further studies are required. The testing and scoring of PD-L1 should be standardized.
Keyphrases
- lymph node
- prostate cancer
- high grade
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- clinical trial
- case control
- end stage renal disease
- primary care
- radical prostatectomy
- small cell lung cancer
- endothelial cells
- newly diagnosed
- mouse model
- ejection fraction
- locally advanced
- chronic kidney disease
- low dose
- free survival
- emergency department
- squamous cell carcinoma
- prognostic factors
- atomic force microscopy
- low grade
- peritoneal dialysis
- combination therapy
- clinical practice
- metabolic syndrome
- type diabetes
- high dose
- adipose tissue
- phase ii
- radiation therapy
- rectal cancer
- insulin resistance
- electronic health record