Login / Signup

A Test of the Validity of Imputed Legal Immigration Status.

Marcelo CastilloAlexandra HillThomas Hertz
Published in: Demography (2024)
We evaluate the performance of a widely used technique for imputing the legal immigration status of U.S. immigrants in survey data-the logical imputation method. We validate this technique by implementing it in a nationally representative survey of U.S. farmworkers that includes a well-regarded measure of legal status. When using this measure as a benchmark, the imputation algorithm correctly identifies the legal status of 78% of farmworkers. Of all the variables included in the algorithm, we find that Medicaid participation poses the greatest challenge for accuracy. Using the American Community Survey, we show that increased Medicaid enrollments stemming from the implementation of the Affordable Care Act in 2014 led to sizable changes in the share of immigrants imputed as legal over time and across space. We explore the implications of these changes for two previous studies and conclude that including Medicaid criteria in the imputation algorithm can significantly impact research findings. We also provide tools to gauge the sensitivity of results.
Keyphrases
  • affordable care act
  • health insurance
  • machine learning
  • healthcare
  • deep learning
  • mental health
  • gene expression
  • neural network
  • data analysis