Login / Signup

Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Disinfection Technologies Used in Small Drinking Water Systems.

Christopher H JonesElizabeth G ShillingKarl G LindenSherri M Cook
Published in: Environmental science & technology (2018)
Treatment included cartridge filtration followed by either chlorine disinfection or ultraviolet disinfection with chlorine residual addition. Environmental performance was evaluated for various chlorine contact zone materials (plastic, concrete, steel), ultraviolet validation factors (1.2 to 4.4), and electricity sources (renewable; U.S. average, high, and low impact grids). Performance was also evaluated when filtration and chlorine residual were not required. From a life cycle assessment perspective, replacing chlorine with UV was preferred only in a limited number of cases (i.e., high pumping pressure but filtration is not required). In all others, chlorine was environmentally preferred, although some contact zone materials and energy sources had an impact on the comparison. Utilities can use these data to inform their disinfection technology selection and operation to minimize environmental and human health impacts.
Keyphrases
  • drinking water
  • life cycle
  • human health
  • health risk assessment
  • health risk
  • risk assessment
  • climate change
  • electronic health record
  • heavy metals
  • big data
  • artificial intelligence
  • aqueous solution