Protecting the Airway and the Physician: Lessons from 214 Cases of Endotracheal Intubation Litigation.
Jean Daniel EloyAnna A PashkovaMolly AminChristy AnthonyDaisy MunozYuriy GubenkoShivani PatelAnna KorbanAndrea PeralesPeter F SviderJean Anderson EloyPublished in: Anesthesiology research and practice (2022)
Litigation involves injuries sustained in numerous settings. The most common factors present included sustaining permanent deficits, including anoxic brain injury. The presence of this latter injury increased the likelihood of a case being resolved with payment. Finally, deficits in informed consent were noted in numerous cases, stressing the importance of a clear process in which the physician explains specific risks (such as those detailed in this analysis), benefits, and alternatives.