Free Flap Outcomes of Microvascular Reconstruction after Repeated Segmental Mandibulectomy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
Jennifer An-Jou LinCharles Yuen Yung LohChia-Hsuan TsaiKai-Ping ChangJohn Chung-Han WuHuang-Kai KaoPublished in: Scientific reports (2019)
This is the first study to investigate the impact of a second fibula flap or a soft tissue flap combined with bridging plate for a repeated segmental mandibulectomy reconstruction on flap outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. A retrospective comparative analysis (2007-2016) of 61 patients who underwent a second segmental mandibulectomy was performed. 20 patients underwent a fibula flap reconstruction whereas 41 had a soft tissue flap and plate reconstruction. No significant difference was seen in the operative time, total hospital stay, flap loss, re-exploration rates, plate exposure rate, or recipient site infection rate. On multivariate analysis, patients reconstructed with a soft tissue flap and bridging plate (odds ratio (OR) 3.997; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.046-15.280, p = 0.043) and complications developed in previous surgery (OR 4.792; 95% CI, 1.120-20.493, p = 0.035) were shown to be independent predictors of a prolonged nasogastric tube dependence. The utilization of a soft tissue flap with plate is associated with comparative results of acute complication rate within 1 week, recipient site infection rate, and plate exposure rate to free fibula flaps alone. Free fibula flaps may result in a decreased risk for prolonged tube dependence compared to free soft tissue flap reconstructions.
Keyphrases
- soft tissue
- breast reconstruction
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- minimally invasive
- peritoneal dialysis
- healthcare
- type diabetes
- magnetic resonance imaging
- coronary artery disease
- computed tomography
- insulin resistance
- hepatitis b virus
- skeletal muscle
- data analysis
- mechanical ventilation
- adverse drug