Ceramic bone graft substitute vs autograft in XLIF: a prospective randomized single-center evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Cristiano Magalhães MenezesGabriel Carvalho LacerdaGermano Senna Oliveira do ValleAndré de Oliveira ArrudaErica Godinho MenezesPublished in: European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society (2022)
The results of this prospective, randomized study support the use of CBGS as a standalone bone graft substitute for autograft in single-level XLIF surgery. The clinical performance and safety outcomes reported here are consistent with published evidence on CBGS. Improvements in patient-reported back pain, leg pain, and disability outcomes were comparable between the CBGS and autograft groups.
Keyphrases
- patient reported
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- bone mineral density
- minimally invasive
- chronic pain
- soft tissue
- multiple sclerosis
- coronary artery bypass
- pain management
- postmenopausal women
- bone regeneration
- metabolic syndrome
- body composition
- systematic review
- coronary artery disease
- adipose tissue
- acute coronary syndrome
- atrial fibrillation
- weight loss
- glycemic control