Login / Signup

Effects of Two Different Methods of Teeth Grinding on Dental Injuries, Skin Lesions, Growth and Behaviour of Suckling Piglets Compared to a Non-Treated Control Group.

Carolin Bernarda TimphausFranziska Anna Kleine KruthaupFritjof FreiseSwetlana HerbrandtElisabeth Grosse BeilageMichaela Fels
Published in: Animals : an open access journal from MDPI (2024)
Teeth grinding in suckling piglets is performed on many farms to protect the piglets' littermates and the sow's udder from injuries caused by the piglets' canines and third incisors. In this study, the effects of two teeth-grinding methods on the piglets' dental health and welfare were investigated. The piglets of a litter were evenly assigned to a treatment: one-third of littermates were ground with a roller grinding head (RG), one-third with a teacup grinding head (TCG), and one-third were not ground at all (CG). A random sample of 100 animals each from the RG and TCG treatment was examined for tooth injuries, i.e., dental pulp openings. Additionally, behavioural analysis was performed ( n = 650 piglets), and skin lesions, growth and mortality were determined ( n = 1565 piglets). TCG piglets had a lower risk ( p < 0.001) of pulp opening than RG piglets (0.08 ± 0.31 vs. 2.67 ± 1.67 opened pulps per piglet). Mortality, growth, skin lesions and behaviour of piglets were not influenced by treatment ( p > 0.05). This study showed that both teeth-grinding methods led to pulp openings. If teeth grinding cannot be avoided on a farm, using the teacup grinding head is recommended concerning animal health and welfare.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • mental health
  • cardiovascular events
  • risk assessment
  • climate change
  • oral health
  • social media
  • single molecule
  • human health
  • high speed