Login / Signup

Determining the defining lengths between mature microRNAs/small interfering RNAs and tinyRNAs.

GeunYoung SimAudrey C KehlingMi Seul ParkCameron DivokyHuaqun ZhangNipun MalhotraJackson SecorKotaro Nakanishi
Published in: bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology (2023)
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are loaded into Argonaute (AGO) proteins, forming RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs). The assembly process establishes the seed, central, 3' supplementary, and tail regions across the loaded guide, enabling the RISC to recognize and cleave target RNAs. This guide segmentation is caused by anchoring the 3' end at the AGO PAZ domain, but the minimum guide length required for the conformation remains to be studied because there was no method by which to do so. Using a 3'→5' exonuclease ISG20, we determined the lengths of AGO-associated miR-20a and let-7a with 3' ends that no longer reach the PAZ domain. Unexpectedly, miR-20a and let-7a needed different lengths, 19 and 20 nt, respectively, to maintain their RISC conformation. This difference can be explained by the low affinity of the PAZ domain for the adenosine at g19 of let-7a, suggesting that the tail-region sequence slightly alters the minimum guide length. We also present that 17-nt guides are sufficiently short enough to function as tinyRNAs (tyRNAs) whose 3' ends are not anchored at the PAZ domain. Since tyRNAs do not have the prerequisite anchoring for the standardized guide segmentation, they would recognize targets differently from miRNAs and siRNAs.
Keyphrases
  • cell proliferation
  • long non coding rna
  • drug delivery
  • deep learning
  • convolutional neural network
  • cancer therapy
  • machine learning
  • drug induced
  • oxidative stress